Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="roydan" data-source="post: 22032" data-attributes="member: 9365">So.. a sig renter is directly responsible for another seller's ability to deliver a service? I think it's a wrong move and that it opens MMO  for liability.By using the same logic.. If MMO require sig renters to take responsibility for their advertisers' wrongdoing or under-deliveries, isn't  MMO responsible for letting them in in the first place? If someone was scammed for $100, the sig renter is expected to pay it back or lose their account. If they haven't, by using the same logic, MMO  should reimburse the guy who was scammed.I think this is chaotic, even without the huge logic hole it has in it (which I won't share here out of the hope that no one abused it yet).I understand why this rule was added in the first place, but besides that, it still opens MMO for more trouble than the ones it solves.I hope you reconsider.</blockquote>