roydan
New member
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2025
- Messages
- 1
- Points
- 0
So.. a sig renter is directly responsible for another seller's ability to deliver a service? I think it's a wrong move and that it opens MMO for liability.
By using the same logic.. If MMO require sig renters to take responsibility for their advertisers' wrongdoing or under-deliveries, isn't MMO responsible for letting them in in the first place? If someone was scammed for $100, the sig renter is expected to pay it back or lose their account. If they haven't, by using the same logic, MMO should reimburse the guy who was scammed.
I think this is chaotic, even without the huge logic hole it has in it (which I won't share here out of the hope that no one abused it yet).
I understand why this rule was added in the first place, but besides that, it still opens MMO for more trouble than the ones it solves.
I hope you reconsider.
By using the same logic.. If MMO require sig renters to take responsibility for their advertisers' wrongdoing or under-deliveries, isn't MMO responsible for letting them in in the first place? If someone was scammed for $100, the sig renter is expected to pay it back or lose their account. If they haven't, by using the same logic, MMO should reimburse the guy who was scammed.
I think this is chaotic, even without the huge logic hole it has in it (which I won't share here out of the hope that no one abused it yet).
I understand why this rule was added in the first place, but besides that, it still opens MMO for more trouble than the ones it solves.
I hope you reconsider.